Re: [PATCH 0/2] block: make some queue limits checks more robust

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: John Garry <john.g.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] block: make some queue limits checks more robust
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 20:25:09 -0400
Cc: axboe@xxxxxxxxx, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20250722102620.3208878-1-john.g.garry@oracle.com> (John Garry's message of "Tue, 22 Jul 2025 10:26:18 +0000")
Organization: Oracle Corporation
References: <20250722102620.3208878-1-john.g.garry@oracle.com>

John,

> This series contains a couple of changes to make request queue limits
> checks more robust.

This is OK with me.

Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
Martin K. Petersen

References:
- [PATCH 0/2] block: make some queue limits checks more robust
  - From: John Garry

Prev by Date: [PATCH v22 14/14] ufs: core: Inform the block layer about write ordering
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] block: Enforce power-of-2 physical block size
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] block: Enforce power-of-2 physical block size
Next by thread: [PATCH] Fixed several coding style issues in the efi driver as reported by checkpatch.pl:
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ATA RAID] [IDE] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux