On 7/22/25 12:26, John Garry wrote:
In blk_stack_limits(), we check that the t->chunk_sectors value is a
multiple of the t->physical_block_size value.
However, by finding the chunk_sectors value in bytes, we may overflow
the unsigned int which holds chunk_sectors, so change the check to be
based on sectors.
Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
block/blk-settings.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-settings.c b/block/blk-settings.c
index a6ac293f47e3..fa53a330f9b9 100644
--- a/block/blk-settings.c
+++ b/block/blk-settings.c
@@ -795,7 +795,7 @@ int blk_stack_limits(struct queue_limits *t, struct queue_limits *b,
}
/* chunk_sectors a multiple of the physical block size? */
- if ((t->chunk_sectors << 9) & (t->physical_block_size - 1)) {
+ if (t->chunk_sectors % (t->physical_block_size >> SECTOR_SHIFT)) {
t->chunk_sectors = 0;
t->flags |= BLK_FLAG_MISALIGNED;
ret = -1;
<Silent round of applause; someone paid attention to the
numerical mathematics course>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect
hare@xxxxxxx +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: I. Totev, A. McDonald, W. Knoblich
