On Sun, Jul 20, 2025 at 11:40:34AM -0700, Keith Busch wrote: > From: Keith Busch <kbusch@xxxxxxxxxx> > > The req_iterator just happens to have a similar fields to what the dma > iterator needs, but we're not necessarily iterating a bio_vec here. Have > the dma iterator define its private fields directly. It also helps to > remove eyesores like "iter->iter.iter". Going back to this after looking at the later patches. The level for which this iter exists is only called blk_map_* as there is nothing dma specific about, just mapping to physical addresses. So maybe call it blk_map_iter instead?
