On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 10:02 PM Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Jens,
>
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 04:08:29PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > As per discussion last week for ublk, I've rebased the block branch
> > for-6.17/block to be based on v6.16-rc4 to avoid a bunch of issues on
> > the ublk side.
> >
> > For ublk, could you folks please check the end results?
>
> Thanks for the rebase.
>
> We have merged commit 4c8a951787ff ("ublk: setup ublk_io correctly in case of
> ublk_get_data() failure") to -rc4, commit c5adc2714c2c ("ublk: move ublk_prep_cancel()
> to case UBLK_IO_COMMIT_AND_FETCH_REQ") becomes not correct any more, can you drop it
> from for-6.17/block?
Indeed, I noticed this too but didn't have time to rebase my patches
before I left for a week. I agree with dropping that commit.
Thank you both,
Caleb
