On 6/30/25 8:02 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> Hi Jens,
>
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 04:08:29PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> As per discussion last week for ublk, I've rebased the block branch
>> for-6.17/block to be based on v6.16-rc4 to avoid a bunch of issues on
>> the ublk side.
>>
>> For ublk, could you folks please check the end results?
>
> Thanks for the rebase.
>
> We have merged commit 4c8a951787ff ("ublk: setup ublk_io correctly in case of
> ublk_get_data() failure") to -rc4, commit c5adc2714c2c ("ublk: move ublk_prep_cancel()
> to case UBLK_IO_COMMIT_AND_FETCH_REQ") becomes not correct any more, can you drop it
> from for-6.17/block?
Done
> Otherwise, the ublk rebase is good.
Thanks for checking!
--
Jens Axboe
