On Tue, 2025-06-24 at 12:11 -0400, Laurence Oberman wrote: > On Tue, 2025-06-24 at 10:21 -0400, Laurence Oberman wrote: > > On Mon, 2025-06-23 at 10:02 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > this series fixes a corruption when drivers using > > > virt_boundary_mask > > > set > > > a limited max_segment_size by accident, which Red Hat reported as > > > causing > > > data corruption with storvsc. I did audit the tree and also > > > found > > > that > > > this can affect SRP and iSER as well. > > > > > > Note that I've dropped the Tested-by from Laurence because the > > > patch > > > changed very slightly from the last version. > > > > > > Diffstat: > > > infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c | 5 +++-- > > > scsi/hosts.c | 20 +++++++++++++------- > > > 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > > > > Grabbing latest and will test tomorrow and reply > > > For the series looks good. > Same testing shows no corruptions on storvsc for the REDO so passed. > For SRP initiators generic testing done with fio and passed, unable > to > test SRP LUNS with Oracle REDO at this time. > > Here it is, enough reviewers already so just the testing > Patches were applied to a 9.6 kernel because I needed such a kernel > for > Oracle compatiility. > > tested-by: Laurence Oberman <oberman@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Nit, fix my email, dropped an l should be loberman@redhat. com of course
