Re: fix virt_boundary_mask handling in SCSI

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2025-06-24 at 10:21 -0400, Laurence Oberman wrote:
> On Mon, 2025-06-23 at 10:02 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > this series fixes a corruption when drivers using
> > virt_boundary_mask
> > set
> > a limited max_segment_size by accident, which Red Hat reported as
> > causing
> > data corruption with storvsc.  I did audit the tree and also found
> > that
> > this can affect SRP and iSER as well.
> > 
> > Note that I've dropped the Tested-by from Laurence because the
> > patch
> > changed very slightly from the last version.
> > 
> > Diffstat:
> >  infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c |    5 +++--
> >  scsi/hosts.c                |   20 +++++++++++++-------
> >  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > 
> Grabbing latest and will test tomorrow and reply
> 
For the series looks good.
Same testing shows no corruptions on storvsc for the REDO so passed.
For SRP initiators generic testing done with fio and passed, unable to
test SRP LUNS with Oracle REDO at this time.

Here it is, enough reviewers already so just the testing
Patches were applied to a 9.6 kernel because I needed such a kernel for
Oracle compatiility.

tested-by: Laurence Oberman <oberman@xxxxxxxxxx>







[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux