Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] man2/mount.2: expand and clarify docs for MS_REMOUNT | MS_BIND

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 ---- On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 23:13:05 +0400  Alejandro Colomar <alx@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote --- 
 > Should we say "mount point" instead?  Otherwise, it's inconsistent with

d-user@comp:/rbt/man-pages$ grep -E -r -I -i 'mount point' /rbt/man-pages/man | wc -l
101
d-user@comp:/rbt/man-pages$ grep -E -r -I -i 'mount-point' /rbt/man-pages/man | wc -l
9
d-user@comp:/rbt/man-pages$ grep -E -r -I -i 'mountpoint' /rbt/man-pages/man | wc -l
4

My experiments show that "mount point" is indeed the most popular variant.

I changed all "mountpoint" to "mount point".

I decided to keep all "per-mount-point".

 > > +have its existing per-mount-point flags
 > > +cleared and replaced with those in
 > > +.I mountflags
 > > +when
 > > +.B MS_REMOUNT
 > > +and
 > > +.B MS_BIND
 > > +are specified.
 > 
 > Maybe reverse the sentence to start with this?

I decided simply to remove that "MS_REMOUNT and MS_BIND" part
(because it is already present in previous sentence).

 > > +This means that if
 > 
 > I would move the 'if' to the next line.

I moved it. But, please, next time do it youself.
I don't plan to become regular man-pages contributor.

I addressed all complains except for listed above and sent v3.

====
Askar Safin
https://types.pl/@safinaskar





[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux