On Wed, Sep 10 2025 at 09:28, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On Mon, 08 Sep 2025 17:31:17 +0100, > As Will points out off the list, the above lacks the a similar > handling for percpu_devid NMIs, leading to NMIs that are only handled > on the first affinity group. > > It's easy enough to move the above to common code and share it with > handle_percpu_devid_fasteoi_nmi(), but at this point there is hardly > any difference with handle_percpu_devid_irq(). > > Any objection to simply killing the NMI version? Removing code is always appreciated :)
