On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 15:47:01 +0100, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 10 2025 at 09:28, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > On Mon, 08 Sep 2025 17:31:17 +0100, > > As Will points out off the list, the above lacks the a similar > > handling for percpu_devid NMIs, leading to NMIs that are only handled > > on the first affinity group. > > > > It's easy enough to move the above to common code and share it with > > handle_percpu_devid_fasteoi_nmi(), but at this point there is hardly > > any difference with handle_percpu_devid_irq(). > > > > Any objection to simply killing the NMI version? > > Removing code is always appreciated :) > Works for me! M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
