On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 11:17:33AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 7:15 PM Danilo Krummrich <dakr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 05:39:07PM +0100, Igor Korotin wrote: > > > I could suggest on of the following: > > > DRV0001 > > > DRVR0001 > > > PDRV0001 > > > > This one looks reasonable to me. > > > > > TEST0001 > > > TST0001 > > Can we please avoid using made up device IDs in the code, even if it > is just sample code? > > It is way better to use a real one that's been reserved already as > "never use in real ACPI tables" for some reason. I think I can find a > few of these for you if need be. > > Thanks! Sure! Please let me know which one you think fits best and I'll use it instead of "TST0001" when I apply the series. - Danilo
