On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 7:15 PM Danilo Krummrich <dakr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 05:39:07PM +0100, Igor Korotin wrote: > > I could suggest on of the following: > > DRV0001 > > DRVR0001 > > PDRV0001 > > This one looks reasonable to me. > > > TEST0001 > > TST0001 Can we please avoid using made up device IDs in the code, even if it is just sample code? It is way better to use a real one that's been reserved already as "never use in real ACPI tables" for some reason. I think I can find a few of these for you if need be. Thanks!
