On Fri, Jun 6, 2025 at 3:32 PM Danilo Krummrich <dakr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 06, 2025 at 03:26:13PM +0100, Igor Korotin wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 6, 2025 at 2:50 PM Danilo Krummrich <dakr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > However, I don't understand why we need this and the subsequent > > > is_acpi_device_node() and is_of_node() checks. > > > > The idea is to avoid unnecessary table lookups when both OF and ACPI > > match tables are present. > > Ok, that's fair -- let's build it on top of the FwNode abstractions though. I'm ok with the FwNode abstractions. Just to make sure I understood you correctly: I'll need to wait until these FwNode abstractions are pushed to the rust-next branch, reimplement what is necessary and send v3. Is this the course of actions? Thanks Igor
