On Fri, Jun 06, 2025 at 03:26:13PM +0100, Igor Korotin wrote: > On Fri, Jun 6, 2025 at 2:50 PM Danilo Krummrich <dakr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > However, I don't understand why we need this and the subsequent > > is_acpi_device_node() and is_of_node() checks. > > The idea is to avoid unnecessary table lookups when both OF and ACPI > match tables are present. Ok, that's fair -- let's build it on top of the FwNode abstractions though.
