Hi Boris, On 9/11/25 8:08 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > Please tone this down in the future - it is really annoying and doesn't bring > a whole lot by repeating things or explaining the obvious. Just concentrate on > explaining why the patch exists and mention any non-obvious things. > > Everything else people can find by searching the net. Thank you very much for this guidance. You raise two issues: repeating things and too much text that explains the obvious. About repeating things: As I see it the annoying repeating results from desire to follow the "context-problem-solution" changelog script while also ensuring each patch stands on its own. With these new features many patches share the same context and then copy&paste results. I see how this can be annoying when going through the series and I can also see how this is a lazy approach since the context is not tailored to each patch. Will work on this. About too much text that explains the obvious: I hear you and will add these criteria to how changelogs are measured. I do find the criteria a bit subjective though and expect that I will not get this right immediately and appreciate and welcome your feedback until I do. Thank you very much. Reinette
