On Sat, Jul 26, 2025 at 12:07 AM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > As promised, the storm has arrived :-) > > There are a two anomalies this time around, but thankfully only one conflict, > and a trivial one at that (details on that in the MMIO Stale Data pull request). > > 1. The "no assignment" pull request depends on the IRQs and MMIO Stale Data > pull requests. I created the topic branch based on the IRQs branch (minus > one commit that came in later), and then merged in the MMIO branch to create > a common base. All the commits came out as I wanted, but the diff stats > generated by `git request-pull` are funky, so I doctored them up, a lot. > > 2. The "SEV cache maintenance" pull request is based on a tag/branch from the > tip tree. I don't think you need to do anything special here? Except > possibly mention it to Linus if the KVM pull request happens to get sent > before the associated tip pull request (which seems unlikely given how they > send a bunch of small pulls). Pulled everything except the lone TDX commit, thanks. I'm going to start testing without it. Paolo
