On 6/4/2025 8:41 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > I think printing the bitmap is fine for unknown bits set... after > all, you might have surprise vectors. Maybe a list would be cleaner > by some definition, but we already print bitmaps all over the place. > It is not critical as long as the information necessary for > debugging is there. In fact, it is often better for the information > to be compact so users don't get tempted to abbreviate a bug report. Sure, will print the full bitmap here. Since this is the unknown NMI message, it may have unexpected bits set in the bitmap.
