On 6/3/25 11:02, Sohil Mehta wrote: > The 3rd parameter pertains to handler "flags". The only flag in use > right now is NMI_FLAG_FIRST. Assuming that more flags might get added > later, the 0 should probably correspond to NMI_FLAG_NONE. Agree? > > The other option would be NMI_FLAG_LAST, which would be the opposite of > NMI_FLAG_FIRST, but that seems shortsighted. I don't feel as strongly about the flags. But this code has been there for over a decade as-is, so I don't think we need to be planning to add a bunch more flags.
