On Wed, May 21, 2025, Chao Gao wrote: > On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 08:20:54AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > >On 5/15/25 08:41, Ingo Molnar wrote: > >> * Chao Gao <chao.gao@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> I kindly request your consideration for merging this series. Most of > >>> patches have received Reviewed-by/Acked-by tags. > >> I don't see anything objectionable in this series. > >> > >> The upcoming v6.16 merge window is already quite crowded in terms of > >> FPU changes, so I think at this point we are looking at a v6.17 merge, > >> done shortly after v6.16-rc1 if everything goes well. Dave, what do you > >> think? > > > >It's getting into shape, but it has a slight shortage of reviews. For > >now, it's an all-Intel patch even though I _thought_ AMD had this > >feature too. It's also purely for KVM and has some suggested-by's from > >Sean, but no KVM acks on it. > > > >Sean is not exactly the quiet type about things, but it always warms me > >heart to see an acked-by accompanying a suggested-by because it > >indicates that the suggestion was heard and implemented properly. > > Hi Sean, John, > > Based on Dave's feedback, could you please review this series and provide your > reviewed-by/acked-by if appropriate? The initialization of default features is a bit gnarly and I think can be improved without too much fuss, but otherwise this looks good.
