On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 08:20:54AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: >On 5/15/25 08:41, Ingo Molnar wrote: >> * Chao Gao <chao.gao@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> I kindly request your consideration for merging this series. Most of >>> patches have received Reviewed-by/Acked-by tags. >> I don't see anything objectionable in this series. >> >> The upcoming v6.16 merge window is already quite crowded in terms of >> FPU changes, so I think at this point we are looking at a v6.17 merge, >> done shortly after v6.16-rc1 if everything goes well. Dave, what do you >> think? > >It's getting into shape, but it has a slight shortage of reviews. For >now, it's an all-Intel patch even though I _thought_ AMD had this >feature too. It's also purely for KVM and has some suggested-by's from >Sean, but no KVM acks on it. > >Sean is not exactly the quiet type about things, but it always warms me >heart to see an acked-by accompanying a suggested-by because it >indicates that the suggestion was heard and implemented properly. Hi Sean, John, Based on Dave's feedback, could you please review this series and provide your reviewed-by/acked-by if appropriate?
