Re: [PATCH 0/3] Unify IBRS virtualization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 04:33:49PM +0000, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> To properly virtualize IBRS on Intel, an IBPB is executed on emulated
> VM-exits to provide separate predictor modes for L1 and L2.
> 
> Similar handling is theoretically needed for AMD, unless IbrsSameMode is
> enumerated by the CPU (which should be the case for most/all CPUs
> anyway). For correctness and clarity, this series generalizes the
> handling to apply for both Intel and AMD as needed.
> 
> I am not sure if this series would land through the kvm-x86 tree or the
> tip/x86 tree.

Sean, any thoughts about this (or general feedback about this series)?

> 
> Yosry Ahmed (3):
>   x86/cpufeatures: Define X86_FEATURE_AMD_IBRS_SAME_MODE
>   KVM: x86: Propagate AMD's IbrsSameMode to the guest
>   KVM: x86: Generalize IBRS virtualization on emulated VM-exit
> 
>  arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h       |  1 +
>  arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c                     |  1 +
>  arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c                |  2 ++
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c                | 11 +----------
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.h                       | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>  tools/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h |  1 +
>  6 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.48.1.601.g30ceb7b040-goog
> 




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux