Hi Sue, On Thu, Aug 7, 2025 at 2:36 AM Sue via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > 1. section 3.2.2. > > old text:/ > The duration of such period and feasibility of discontinuing DNS64 support, > relying solely on RA-based PREF64 signaling in a given network depends on > the endpoint footprint, particularly the presence and number of endpoints > running outdated operating systems, which do not support [RFC8781]./ > > Comment: This sentence tries to give advice about the transition > period, but the English sentence does not provide a clear recommendation. > It is clear that the choices are: > 1) when to discontinue DNS65 support > 2) how many endpoints are been upgraded to recent OS that supports RFC8781 > > But is not clear what the recommendation is. Ah, good point. Actually we are not even trying to provide any recommendations here, just outline factors to consider. I agree, based on the title of the sections 3 and 3.2, recommendations are expected. How about adding another sentence after the one you quote? Smth like: "Operators are advised to take those factors into account prior to the migration." Would that address your concern? -- Cheers, Jen Linkova -- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
