Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thank you for the review. We'll be working on edits this week and
> anticipate getting a new version out before the I-D deadline.
I have proposed text for each issue to my co-authors, but your comments would
be appreciated. Did I understand your review comments correctly?
> https://github.com/anima-wg/brski-cloud/issues/233
I am confused here: VAR is in the 1.1 terminology, and is expanded a few
times when it is used. What else would you like?
> https://github.com/anima-wg/brski-cloud/issues/234
https://github.com/anima-wg/brski-cloud/pull/240
There are no new DHCP options defined in this document for VoIP :-)
There are many existing ones, which if a phone/device was deployed on the
enterprise campus, would be used. But, since the device is located elsewhere,
configuration of those options is non-trivial.
I have reworded the text to make that clearer.
> https://github.com/anima-wg/brski-cloud/issues/235
https://github.com/anima-wg/brski-cloud/pull/243
> https://github.com/anima-wg/brski-cloud/issues/236
https://github.com/anima-wg/brski-cloud/pull/242
> https://github.com/anima-wg/brski-cloud/issues/238
https://github.com/anima-wg/brski-cloud/pull/241
> https://github.com/anima-wg/brski-cloud/issues/237
https://github.com/anima-wg/brski-cloud/pull/239
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
