S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thanks for writing draft-richardson-in-memorium-00 [1].
Thank you. I have many bad ideas I like to share.
I know I posted to a Telegram about this, and fixed typos already.
I guess I know who reads the I-D announce list.
> RFC 6890 states that the IETF occasionally reserves an address block
> for a special purpose in order to support new protocols or practices.
> I'll leave it to other people to discuss whether the requests in
> Section 5 fit within protocols or practices.
yeah, it would be a "practice", and maybe it also re-asserts that v6
addresses are not scarce. Let's see who complains about my address
allocation proposal, and how it's not RFC10K safe. (But it could be)
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
