[Last-Call] Re: draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-j2k-scl-05 ietf last call Secdir review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Wes,

Thanks for the feedback.

I have entered the issues in the tracker [1] and will start processing them.

[1] https://github.com/ietf-wg-avtcore/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-j2k-scl/issues

Best,

-- Pierre

On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 3:22 PM Wes Hardaker via Datatracker
<noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Document: draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-j2k-scl
> Title: RTP Payload Format for sub-codestream latency JPEG 2000 streaming
> Reviewer: Wes Hardaker
> Review result: Has Nits
>
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
> effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments
> were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document
> editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call
> comments.
>
> The summary of the review is: ready with a few minor comments/nits
>
> Version reviewed: -05
>
> Overall: the document is extremely well written with less typos than I've
> generally seen in most documents (especially my own).  Well done!
>
> Comments:
>
> - I'm less familiar with the anima work, but generally there are a lot of
> acronyms that don't get an early spell-out-expansion (eg: PLM, PLT, ORDH, ORDB,
> POS, PID, SOC, EOC, etc).  But maybe this is normal for anima documents?
>
> - The biggest of the security related things I've wondered is what happens if
> things like MUSTs are not followed.  For example, if the timestamp frames do
> not advance at required regular intervals, what does the client get and can
> that be used to mess with their results in some way?  What happens if the ESEQ
> * 65536 + sequence number wraps around an int32 or int64?
>
> - What happens to a client if the jpeg2000-scl type is sent with parameters of
> width=HUGE, height=HUGE?  Is 2^32 bits really needed?  What happens if a client
> ties to pre-allocate memory based on receiving this sizing requirements?
>
> - the smallest of nits ever I think:  in appendix A, the table order is NAME
> SAMP COMPS ... but the description order is NAME COMPS SAMP ...
>
>
>

-- 
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux