[Last-Call] Re: [Uta] Re: Concern about draft-ietf-uta-require-tls13-10 with IoT protocols

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



BTW: A MUST with an otherwise clause, is to me, a SHOULD.

 

It is not an otherwise clause.  It is a MUST and you MAY also do this.

 

(Also, what's a non-default option.  Either it can be negotiated, so it's

on by default, or it won't be negotiated, so it's really off.)

 

Don’t think protocol, think application settings.

 

 

 

 

--

Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )

           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

 

 

 

 

 

<<attachment: smime.p7s>>

-- 
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux