It appears that Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@xxxxxxxxx> said: >I have read this thread at least up to this point. > >In my opinion, the Security Considerations section of a protocol RFC >should, to some extent, view the larger picture including >considerations not strictly encompassed by the protocol. If I were >deciding, I would include an informational reference to DKIM ... As I presume you saw, ekr made a similar suggestion a few days ago, followed by extensive discussion pointing out that DKIM says nothing about authenticity or confidentiality, and very little about integrity, so it's not about security as we usually understand it. It would be helpful to me if you could say what we missed in that discussion so we don't have to rehash it again. R's, John -- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
