On 19-Mar-25 11:54, Ned Smith via Datatracker wrote:
Reviewer: Ned Smith
Review result: Ready
The update to RFC6724 adjusts the IP address selection precedence to favor IPv6
global unicast and unique local addresses above IPv4 addresses. It demotes the
6to4 tunneling option reflecting the decreased reliance on IPv4 deployments. It
also makes rule 5.5 mandatory which prefers addresses in a prefix advertised by
next-hop routers.
I found no significant issues. I had a couple of questions related to word
choice. The authors or other reviewers may determine whether they are
significant enough to make a change.
Introduction:
- 4th paragraph: Wording seems awkward:
S/a label that differs to general ULA prefixes/a label that
differs from general ULA prefixes/ OR S/a label that differs to
general ULA prefixes/a label that defers to general ULA
prefixes/
Section 5.3:
- S/how the learnt known-local/how the learned known-local/
I couldn't find "learnt" in a US English dictionary.
But it is in any British English dictionary. All the RFC Editor requests
is consistency (all British or all American spellings). I don't know
which the authors have chosen.
Brian
--
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
