IETF Discussion

• Thread Index

• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Tony Rutkowski
• IETF-100 maybe it's mostly been said? (Was: Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100)
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Carlos Martinez
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Margaret Cullen
• RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Christer Holmberg
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Margaret Cullen
• Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Niels ten Oever
• Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Jeffrey Haas
• Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Niels ten Oever
• Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Lawrence Conroy
• Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Fred Baker (fred)
• Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: nalini.elkins
• RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
• Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Barry Raveendran Greene
• Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Fred Baker (fred)
• Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Re: IAB volunteers
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Barry Raveendran Greene
• Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Re: IAB volunteers
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: tom p.
• Re: IAB volunteers
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: John Hoe
• IETF 96 - Meeting Information
  • From: IETF Secretariat
• Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Harish Pillay
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• RE: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Hutton, Andrew
• Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: IAB volunteers
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Dhruv Dhody
• Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Leslie Daigle
• Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
  • From: Michal Krsek
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: otroan
• Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
  • From: Sandoche Balakrichenan
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Ole Troan
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Vinayak Hegde
• IAB volunteers
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: tom p.
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Mikael Abrahamsson
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Sandoche Balakrichenan
• RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Jose Saldana
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Mark Nottingham
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Lixia Zhang
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Xiaohong Deng
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: [E] Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Gross, Scott W
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Tony Rutkowski
• Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Benson Schliesser
• Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Jakob Heitz
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: kathleen . moriarty . ietf
• Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Benson Schliesser
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Marie-Jose Montpetit
• A Modest Proposal
  • From: jswift.ietf
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Benson Schliesser
• Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Margaret Cullen
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Margaret Cullen
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: James Seng
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Mikael Abrahamsson
• Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: George Michaelson
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: IAOC Chair
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Lemon
• RE: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: MH Michael Hammer (5304)
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Vinayak Hegde
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Vinayak Hegde
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Michal Krsek
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings [was IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input]
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Adam Roach
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Margaret Cullen
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Mikael Abrahamsson
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: [Idr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server-10.txt> (Internet Exchange BGP Route Server) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Marco Marzetti
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Patrick McManus
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [Idr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server-10.txt> (Internet Exchange BGP Route Server) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Marco Marzetti
• Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
  • From: George Michaelson
• Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Testimony to US Commerce Committee
  • From: Fred Baker (fred)
• RE: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Andrew Allen
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Margaret Cullen
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Barry Raveendran Greene
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Testimony to US Commerce Committee
  • From: IAB Chair
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Mikael Abrahamsson
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Alia Atlas
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: John Levine
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Alia Atlas
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Kathleen Moriarty
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Alia Atlas
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Barry Raveendran Greene
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input (off-topic)
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Alia Atlas
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Alia Atlas
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Kathleen Moriarty
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Adam Roach
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Melinda Shore
• IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Barry Raveendran Greene
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Adam Roach
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Adam Roach
• Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
  • From: Adam Roach
• Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings [was IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input]
  • From: HANSEN, TONY L
• Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
  • From: Leslie Daigle
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Havana and Juggalos (was: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input)
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: Havana and Juggalos (was: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input)
  • From: Theodore V Faber
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: kathleen . moriarty . ietf
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Richard Barnes
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Adam Roach
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
  • From: Adam Roach
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Eric Rescorla
• Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings [was IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input]
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Eric Rescorla
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Sandoche Balakrichenan
• Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
  • From: Leslie Daigle
• Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings
  • From: kathleen . moriarty . ietf
• Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings [was IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input]
  • From: kathleen . moriarty . ietf
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings
  • From: Alia Atlas
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Mikael Abrahamsson
• Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings
  • From: Loa Andersson
• Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings [was IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input]
  • From: kathleen . moriarty . ietf
• Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings
  • From: Joel Jaeggli
• Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
  • From: Jari Arkko
• RE: build personal contacts outside of meetings
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Gen-ART LC review of draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis
  • From: Roni Even
• Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: lloyd.wood
• Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings [was IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input]
  • From: Alia Atlas
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: lloyd.wood
• Re: build personal contacts outside of meetings [was IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input]
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Randall Gellens
• build personal contacts outside of meetings [was IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: S Moonesamy
• RE: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
  • From: Alissa Cooper
• Mailing lists, venues, Singapore, IETF 100
  • From: Leslie Daigle
• Re: A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Margaret Cullen
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: [dmarc-ietf] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability-15.txt> (Interoperability Issues Between DMARC and Indirect Email Flows) to Informational RFC
  • From: Franck Martin
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Behcet Sarikaya
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Jari Arkko
• A couple of meta points -- IETF 100, Singapore, onwards
  • From: Leslie Daigle
• RE: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: John E Drake
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Harish Pillay
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Bob Hinden
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Harish Pillay
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Toerless Eckert
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Allison Mankin
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: lloyd.wood
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Melinda Shore
• RE: [dmarc-ietf] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability-15.txt> (Interoperability Issues Between DMARC and Indirect Email Flows) to Informational RFC
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: l.wood
• RE: [dmarc-ietf] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability-15.txt> (Interoperability Issues Between DMARC and Indirect Email Flows) to Informational RFC
  • From: John R Levine
• RE: [dmarc-ietf] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability-15.txt> (Interoperability Issues Between DMARC and Indirect Email Flows) to Informational RFC
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: [dmarc-ietf] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability-15.txt> (Interoperability Issues Between DMARC and Indirect Email Flows) to Informational RFC
  • From: John Levine
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Andrew Allen
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: [dmarc-ietf] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability-15.txt> (Interoperability Issues Between DMARC and Indirect Email Flows) to Informational RFC
  • From: Alexey Melnikov
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: kathleen . moriarty . ietf
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Loa Andersson
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability-15.txt> (Interoperability Issues Between DMARC and Indirect Email Flows) to Informational RFC
  • From: John Levine
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: John Levine
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Lixia Zhang
• IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Richard Barnes
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability-15.txt> (Interoperability Issues Between DMARC and Indirect Email Flows) to Informational RFC
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Michal Krsek
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Peterson, Jon
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Michal Krsek
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Eric Rescorla
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: IESG meeting thoughts
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: IESG meeting thoughts
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: The ecosystem is moving
  • From: Nico Williams
• Fw: just look at that
  • From: bensons
• Proposed modification of IPR notice inside each ID/RFC
  • From: tglassey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: Gen-ART IETF Last Call review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-12
  • From: Martin Bjorklund
• Gen-ART IETF Telechat review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-12
  • From: Dale R. Worley
• Re: GenArt LC review: draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos-15
  • From: Robert Sparks
• Re: GenArt LC review: draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos-15
  • From: Robert Sparks
• Re: GenArt LC review: draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos-15
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Gen-ART IETF Last Call review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-12
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: IESG meeting thoughts
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: IESG meeting thoughts
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: IESG meeting thoughts
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Adam Roach
• IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: IAOC Chair
• Re: IESG meeting thoughts
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: IESG meeting thoughts
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: IESG meeting thoughts
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: IESG meeting thoughts
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: IESG meeting thoughts
  • From: Bert Wijnen (IETF)
• Re: IESG meeting thoughts
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: IESG meeting thoughts
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: IESG meeting thoughts
  • From: Bert Wijnen (IETF)
• IESG meeting thoughts
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: The ecosystem is moving
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: The ecosystem is moving
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: The ecosystem is moving
  • From: Richard Shockey
• Re: The ecosystem is moving
  • From: Richard Shockey
• Re: The ecosystem is moving
  • From: John Levine
• Re: The ecosystem is moving
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: The ecosystem is moving
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: The ecosystem is moving
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• Re: The ecosystem is moving
  • From: Matthew Kerwin
• Re: The ecosystem is moving
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: The ecosystem is moving
  • From: John Levine
• Re: The ecosystem is moving
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: The ecosystem is moving
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: The ecosystem is moving
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: The ecosystem is moving
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: The ecosystem is moving
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: The ecosystem is moving
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: The ecosystem is moving
  • From: Alia Atlas
• Re: The ecosystem is moving
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: The ecosystem is moving
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: The ecosystem is moving
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: The ecosystem is moving
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: The ecosystem is moving
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: The ecosystem is moving
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: Sad news: Prof.Suguru Yamaguchi passed on May 9th, 2016
  • From: David Conrad
• Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-rpsl-sig-10.txt> (Securing RPSL Objects with RPKI Signatures) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Sandra Murphy
• Code Sprint in Berlin
  • From: IETF Chair
• Gen-ART IETF Last Call review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-12
  • From: Dale R. Worley
• Sad news: Prof.Suguru Yamaguchi passed on May 9th, 2016
  • From: Hiroshi Esaki
• Re: The ecosystem is moving
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-rpsl-sig-10.txt> (Securing RPSL Objects with RPKI Signatures) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Sandra Murphy
• Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-rpsl-sig-10.txt> (Securing RPSL Objects with RPKI Signatures) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Brian Haberman
• Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-rpsl-sig-10.txt> (Securing RPSL Objects with RPKI Signatures) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Randy Bush
• 答复: The ecosystem is moving
  • From: Hejianfei (Jeffrey)
• Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-rpsl-sig-10.txt> (Securing RPSL Objects with RPKI Signatures) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Brian Haberman
• The ecosystem is moving
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: xml2rfc.ietf.org down?
  • From: Henrik Levkowetz
• Re: xml2rfc.ietf.org down?
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• xml2rfc.ietf.org down?
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Topics in IETF leadership team retreats
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: IETF registration fees...
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-isis-node-admin-tag-10
  • From: Pushpasis Sarkar
• Re: IETF 96 - Registration and Hotel Reservations Now Open!
  • From: Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
• Re: IETF registration fees...
  • From: Mary Barnes
• Re: IETF registration fees...
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: IETF registration fees...
  • From: John Levine
• IETF registration fees...
  • From: Michael Richardson
• IETF 96 - Registration and Hotel Reservations Now Open!
  • From: IETF Secretariat
• Update on Remote Mentoring: Internet Draft Review Teams
  • From: nalini.elkins
• IETF 96 To Open for Registration Soon
  • From: IETF Administrative Director
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tls-chacha20-poly1305-04 - resend
  • From: Wan-Teh Chang
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tls-chacha20-poly1305-04 - resend
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-use-case-06
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-v6ops-host-addr-availability-05
  • From: Vint Cerf
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tls-chacha20-poly1305-04 - resend
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-isis-node-admin-tag-10
  • From: Pushpasis Sarkar
• Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-v6ops-host-addr-availability-05
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: Gen-ART review ofdraft-ietf-rtcweb-alpn-03
  • From: Martin Thomson
• Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-alpn-03 (Was: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review ofdraft-ietf-rtcweb-alpn-03)
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-isis-node-admin-tag-10
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-v6ops-host-addr-availability-05
  • From: Jari Arkko
• IAB sent comments on ICANN draft bylaws
  • From: IAB Chair
• CFP: ACM, IRTF & ISOC Applied Networking Research Workshop 2016
  • From: Eggert, Lars
• Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-isis-node-admin-tag-10
  • From: Peter Yee
• Re: [tsvwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos-15.txt> (DSCP and other packet markings for WebRTC QoS) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Colin Perkins
• RE: [tsvwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos-15.txt> (DSCP and other packet markings for WebRTC QoS) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Black, David
• Appointment to the Internet Society Board of Trustees
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: [tsvwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos-15.txt> (DSCP and other packet markings for WebRTC QoS) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ted Hardie
• RE: [tsvwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos-15.txt> (DSCP and other packet markings for WebRTC QoS) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Black, David
• RE: [tsvwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos-15.txt> (DSCP and other packet markings for WebRTC QoS) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Black, David
• Re: [tsvwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos-15.txt> (DSCP and other packet markings for WebRTC QoS) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ted Hardie
• RE: [tsvwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos-15.txt> (DSCP and other packet markings for WebRTC QoS) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Paul E. Jones
• RE: [tsvwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos-15.txt> (DSCP and other packet markings for WebRTC QoS) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Black, David
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-isis-node-admin-tag-08
  • From: Pushpasis Sarkar
• RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-isis-node-admin-tag-08
  • From: Peter Yee
• Re: [tsvwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos-15.txt> (DSCP and other packet markings for WebRTC QoS) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Paul E. Jones
• Re: GenArt LC review: draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos-15
  • From: Paul E. Jones
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-isis-node-admin-tag-08
  • From: Pushpasis Sarkar
• Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology")
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology")
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-isis-node-admin-tag-08
  • From: Pushpasis Sarkar
• Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology")
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-isis-node-admin-tag-08
  • From: Peter Yee
• Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology")
  • From: Stephan Wenger
• Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology")
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-rpsl-sig-10.txt> (Securing RPSL Objects with RPKI Signatures) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Tom Harrison
• Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-use-case-06
  • From: Dale R. Worley
• Grants for Cybersecurity in Africa, LAC and AP regions
  • From: Carlos M. Martinez
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Joe Touch
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-05.txt> (Requirements for Subscription to YANG Datastores) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Eric Voit (evoit)
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-05.txt> (Requirements for Subscription to YANG Datastores) to Proposed Standard
  • From: tom p.
• Re: [95all] IETF-95 summary articles
  • From: Linda Klieforth
• Re: [95all] IETF-95 summary articles
  • From: Linda Klieforth
• IETF-95 summary articles
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• RE: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Community Input Requested on Update to Trust Records Retention Policy
  • From: IETF Administrative Director
• Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology")
  • From: Stephan Wenger
• Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology")
  • From: Jari Arkko
• A kwik brcwn fcks jamps ovur ya leizi dcg ( Developer seeks FUNDING )
  • From: Casey Farrell
• Re: draft-arkko-ietf-trends-and-observations-00
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Re: [aqm] Last Call: <draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-11.txt> (AQM Characterization Guidelines) to Informational RFC
  • From: Wesley Eddy
• Re: Spam catcher
  • From: Niels Dettenbach (Syndicat.com)
• Re: Spam catcher
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration (off-topic)
  • From: Corinne Cath
• Re: Spam catcher
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Spam catcher
  • From: Howard Hong
• Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration (off-topic)
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration
  • From: lloyd.wood
• Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration
  • From: Ross Finlayson
• Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration
  • From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
• Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration
  • From: Adam Roach
• Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration
  • From: nalini.elkins
• RE: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration
  • From: Mary Barnes
• Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC/Telechat review of draft-ietf-pce-iro-update-06
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-tictoc-ptp-mib-08
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-tictoc-ptp-mib-08
  • From: vinays
• Re: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-tictoc-ptp-mib-08
  • From: vinays
• Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration
  • From: Adam Roach
• Re: [aqm] Last Call: <draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-11.txt> (AQM Characterization Guidelines) to Informational RFC
  • From: Dave Täht
• Re: [IAB] Call for Comment: <draft-iab-rfc3677bis> (IETF ISOC Board of Trustee Appointment Procedures)
  • From: Scott O. Bradner
• Re: [IAB] Call for Comment: <draft-iab-rfc3677bis> (IETF ISOC Board of Trustee Appointment Procedures)
  • From: Scott O. Bradner
• Re: [IAB] Call for Comment: <draft-iab-rfc3677bis> (IETF ISOC Board of Trustee Appointment Procedures)
  • From: Scott O. Bradner
• Re: [IAB] Call for Comment: <draft-iab-rfc3677bis> (IETF ISOC Board of Trustee Appointment Procedures)
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: [IAB] Call for Comment: <draft-iab-rfc3677bis> (IETF ISOC Board of Trustee Appointment Procedures)
  • From: Scott O. Bradner
• Re: [IAB] Call for Comment: <draft-iab-rfc3677bis> (IETF ISOC Board of Trustee Appointment Procedures)
  • From: Scott O. Bradner
• Re: [IAB] Call for Comment: <draft-iab-rfc3677bis> (IETF ISOC Board of Trustee Appointment Procedures)
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration
  • From: Stephan Wenger
• Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [Mtgvenue] Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration
  • From: thomas nadeau
• Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback — for sites currently under active consideration
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: f2f and mailing list participation - a question for "newer" participants (Was: Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration)
  • From: Joseph Lorenzo Hall
• Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration
  • From: Christian O'Flaherty
• f2f and mailing list participation - a question for "newer" participants (Was: Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration)
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration
  • From: Vinayak Hegde
• Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration
  • From: Christian O'Flaherty
• Re: [Mtgvenue] Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: [Mtgvenue] Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration
  • From: Corinne Cath
• Re: [tsvwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos-15.txt> (DSCP and other packet markings for WebRTC QoS) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Magnus Westerlund
• RE: [Recentattendees] Interim step on meetings site feedback — for sites currently under active consideration
  • From: fred.clark
• Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration
  • From: John Levine
• Gen-ART review ofdraft-ietf-rtcweb-alpn-03
  • From: Russ Housley
• A word about mailing lists Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback — for sites currently under active consideration
  • From: Leslie Daigle
• Re: [tsvwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos-15.txt> (DSCP and other packet markings for WebRTC QoS) to Proposed Standard
  • From: gorry
• Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration
  • From: Dan Harkins
• Re: Gen-ART LC/Telechat review of draft-ietf-pce-iro-update-06
  • From: Dhruv Dhody
• RE: Interim step on meetings site feedback — for sites currently under active consideration
  • From: Andrew Allen
• Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback â?? for sites currently under active consideration
  • From: Dan Harkins
• Interim step on meetings site feedback — for sites currently under active consideration
  • From: The IAOC
• Nominations sought: Jonathan B. Postel Service Award 2016
  • From: IETF Administrative Director
• RE: [tsvwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos-15.txt> (DSCP and other packet markings for WebRTC QoS) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Black, David
• Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-tictoc-ptp-mib-08
  • From: Peter Yee
• Gen-ART LC/Telechat review of draft-ietf-pce-iro-update-06
  • From: Peter Yee
• Re: thank you
  • From: Lucy Lynch
• Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees]
  • From: Jared Mauch
• Re: [89attendees] spam on old lists - was Fw: new important message
  • From: Dick Franks
• Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message
  • From: Benson Schliesser
• Re: Time to kill layer 2
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: IETF95 remote attendance
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message
  • From: John Leslie
• Re: [89attendees] spam on old lists - was Fw: new important message
  • From: Carlos M. Martinez
• Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message
  • From: ietf
• Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message
  • From: David Morris
• Re: Last Call: <draft-sheffer-rfc6982bis-00.txt> (Improving Awareness of Running Code: The Implementation Status Section) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message
  • From: John Leslie
• Re: [vmeet] IETF95 remote attendance
  • From: Meetecho IETF support
• Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message (fwd)
  • From: Dick Franks
• Re: IETF95 remote attendance
  • From: Meetecho IETF support
• spam on old lists - was [89attendees] Fw: new important message (fwd)
  • From: paul
• Re: [vmeet] IETF95 remote attendance
  • From: HANSEN, TONY L
• Re: IETF95 remote attendance
  • From: Meetecho IETF support
• Re: IETF95 remote attendance
  • From: Mikael Abrahamsson
• Re: IETF95 remote attendance
  • From: Mikael Abrahamsson
• Re: [vmeet] IETF95 remote attendance
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Time to kill layer 2
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Time to kill layer 2
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Time to kill layer 2
  • From: Time Warner Cable
• Re: [tsvwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos-15.txt> (DSCP and other packet markings for WebRTC QoS) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• IETF95 Mentoring Counts
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Re: IETF95 remote attendance
  • From: Meetecho IETF support
• Re: IETF95 remote attendance
  • From: Simon Pietro Romano
• Re: IETF95 remote attendance
  • From: Joseph Lorenzo Hall
• Re: IETF95 remote attendance
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• RE: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology")
  • From: S Moonesamy
• IETF95 remote attendance
  • From: Meetecho IETF support
• Re: Time to kill layer 2
  • From: Dimitri Staessens
• Re: Time to kill layer 2
  • From: Dimitri Staessens
• RE: Time to kill layer 2
  • From: Chaitanya D
• Re: Time to kill layer 2
  • From: Carlos M. Martinez
• Re: Time to kill layer 2
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Time to kill layer 2
  • From: Dimitri Staessens
• Re: Time to kill layer 2
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Time to kill layer 2
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Remote Mentoring: Internet Draft Review Teams
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Re: Time to kill layer 2
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Time to kill layer 2
  • From: Charlie Perkins
• Re: Time to kill layer 2
  • From: Christopher Morrow
• Re: [rtcweb] Last call redux: draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-26
  • From: Alissa Cooper
• Re: Time to kill layer 2
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Time to kill layer 2
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Time to kill layer 2
  • From: chopps
• Re: Time to kill layer 2
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Time to kill layer 2
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology")
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology")
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology")
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology")
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology")
  • From: Stephan Wenger
• Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology")
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• RE: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology")
  • From: Michael Cameron
• RE: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology")
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Concerns about Singapore
  • From: Theodore V Faber
• Re: Concerns about Singapore
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Fw: new important message
  • From: bensons
• Re: Concerns about Singapore
  • From: Jeffrey Haas
• Re: Concerns about Singapore
  • From: Rich Kulawiec
• Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore]
  • From: Loa Andersson
• Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore]
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places
  • From: tom p.
• Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places
  • From: Tony Finch
• Re: UK blacklist (Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places)
  • From: Tim Chown
• Re: Transparency of IAOC
  • From: SM
• Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore]
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Virtual IETFs (was: Re: Concerns about Singapore)
  • From: Daniel Ajike Chidi
• Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore]
  • From: Alia Atlas
• Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Transparency of IAOC
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: Transparency of IAOC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Transparency of IAOC
  • From: Scott O. Bradner
• Re: Transparency of IAOC
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: UK blacklist (Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places)
  • From: Christopher Morrow
• UK blacklist (Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places)
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Transparency of IAOC
  • From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
• Re: Transparency of IAOC
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Transparency of IAOC
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: Transparency of IAOC
  • From: Brian E Carpenter