IETF Discussion

• Thread Index

• Re: bettering open source involvement
  • From: Eggert, Lars
• Re: bettering open source involvement
  • From: Dave Taht
• Re: bettering open source involvement
  • From: Dave Taht
• Re: bettering open source involvement
  • From: Dave Taht
• Re: bettering open source involvement
  • From: Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
• Re: bettering open source involvement
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: bettering open source involvement
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: bettering open source involvement
  • From: Doug Ewell
• Re: OCSP Stapling
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: [Netconf] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-15
  • From: Kent Watsen
• Re: bettering open source involvement
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• TSV-ART review of draft-pd-dispatch-msrp-websocket
  • From: Allison Mankin
• OCSP Stapling
  • From: Glen
• Re: [Netconf] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-15
  • From: Robert Sparks
• Re: bettering open source involvement
  • From: Eggert, Lars
• Re: bettering open source involvement
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: bettering open source involvement
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: bettering open source involvement
  • From: Alia Atlas
• Re: bettering open source involvement
  • From: Livingood, Jason
• Re: bettering open source involvement
  • From: Livingood, Jason
• Re: bettering open source involvement
  • From: Livingood, Jason
• IETF Last Call Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-15
  • From: Dale R. Worley
• Fw: [Netconf] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-15
  • From: tom p.
• Re: [Netconf] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-15
  • From: t.petch
• Re: bettering open source involvement
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: bettering open source involvement
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: bettering open source involvement
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: bettering open source involvement
  • From: Dave Taht
• Fwd: Upcoming Meeting: IEEE/NIST Workshop on Timing Challenges in the Smart Grid, October 26, 2016
  • From: Robert Moskowitz
• Re: bettering open source involvement
  • From: HANSEN, TONY L
• Re: bettering open source involvement
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-15
  • From: Andy Bierman
• Re: Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-15
  • From: Robert Sparks
• Re: Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-15
  • From: Andy Bierman
• Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-15
  • From: Robert Sparks
• RE: bettering open source involvement
  • From: MH Michael Hammer (5304)
• Re: bettering open source involvement
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: bettering open source involvement
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: bettering open source involvement
  • From: Andy Bierman
• Re: bettering open source involvement
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• RE: bettering open source involvement
  • From: MH Michael Hammer (5304)
• Re: bettering open source involvement
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: bettering open source involvement
  • From: Alia Atlas
• Re: bettering open source involvement
  • From: Alia Atlas
• RE: bettering open source involvement
  • From: MH Michael Hammer (5304)
• Re: bettering open source involvement
  • From: Alia Atlas
• Re: bettering open source involvement
  • From: Riccardo Bernardini
• Re: bettering open source involvement
  • From: Dave Taht
• RE: bettering open source involvement
  • From: MH Michael Hammer (5304)
• Re: bettering open source involvement
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: bettering open source involvement
  • From: Alia Atlas
• Re: bettering open source involvement
  • From: Bjoern A. Zeeb
• Re: bettering open source involvement
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: bettering open source involvement
  • From: Alia Atlas
• Re: bettering open source involvement
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: bettering open source involvement
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: bettering open source involvement
  • From: Octavio Alvarez
• Re: bettering open source involvement
  • From: Riccardo Bernardini
• RE: bettering open source involvement
  • From: MH Michael Hammer (5304)
• Re: bettering open source involvement
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: bettering open source involvement
  • From: Suzanne Woolf
• Re: bettering open source involvement
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: How to get feedback on published RFCs [resending as plaintext]
  • From: Dan Whaley
• Re: bettering open source involvement
  • From: Bjoern A. Zeeb
• Re: bettering open source involvement
  • From: Riccardo Bernardini
• bettering open source involvement
  • From: Dave Taht
• Re: How to get feedback on published RFCs [resending as plaintext]
  • From: Dave Taht
• Re: IETF note well relating to pictures?
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: How to get feedback on published RFCs [resending as plaintext]
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: IETF note well relating to pictures?
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: IETF note well relating to pictures?
  • From: Joe Hildebrand
• Re: IETF note well relating to pictures?
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: IETF note well relating to pictures?
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• The Berlin IETF - Thanks!
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: IETF note well relating to pictures?
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: IETF note well relating to pictures?
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: IETF note well relating to pictures?
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IETF note well relating to pictures?
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
• Re: IETF note well relating to pictures?
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: IETF note well relating to pictures?
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: IETF note well relating to pictures?
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: IETF note well relating to pictures?
  • From: Martin Rex
• Re: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: Theodore V Faber
• Re: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: Tom Pusateri
• Re: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: Mikael Abrahamsson
• Re: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: Mikael Abrahamsson
• Re: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: Mikael Abrahamsson
• RE: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: Andrew Allen
• Re: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: Pat Thaler
• Re: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: Tom Pusateri
• Re: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: Mikael Abrahamsson
• Re: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: Charlie Perkins
• Re: Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [96attendees] [E] Re: Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
• Re: Correction: Request for Proposal: RFC Format CSS Design
  • From: Joe Hildebrand
• mailarchive: Bogus DNSSEC signature
  • From: Stefan Winter
• RE: [E] Re: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: Scharwacht, Kai
• Correction: Request for Proposal: RFC Format CSS Design
  • From: IETF Administrative Director
• Request for Proposal: RFC Format CSS Design
  • From: IETF Administrative Director
• Re: Correction: Request for Proposal: RFC Format CSS Design
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: Correction: Request for Proposal: RFC Format CSS Design
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Correction: Request for Proposal: RFC Format CSS Design
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: DMARC and ietf.org
  • From: John Levine
• Re: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: Mikael Abrahamsson
• Re: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: Kathleen Moriarty
• Re: DMARC and ietf.org
  • From: Alessandro Vesely
• Re: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: Mikael Abrahamsson
• Re: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: Jeff Haas
• Re: DMARC and ietf.org
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: DMARC and ietf.org
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: DMARC and ietf.org
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: mailarchive: Bogus DNSSEC signature
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: DMARC and ietf.org
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: DMARC and ietf.org
  • From: ned+ietf
• RE: Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: Maisonneuve, Julien (Nokia - FR)
• Re: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: Andrew Allen
• Re: Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: Alexandre Petrescu
• Re: Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: mailarchive: Bogus DNSSEC signature
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: Tom Pusateri
• Re: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: Pat Thaler
• Re: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: Tom Pusateri
• Re: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: Tom Pusateri
• Re: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: Jason Nichols
• Re: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: Tim Chown
• Re: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: Andrew Allen
• Re: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: Oliver Hahm
• mailarchive: Bogus DNSSEC signature
  • From: Stefan Winter
• Mailing List: [96attendees] Taking minutes - volunteers
  • From: Suport Administratiu grups-programes de recerca
• Re: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: Kireeti Kompella
• Re: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• Re: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: Pat Thaler
• working group reports
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: Pat Thaler
• Re: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: Stuart Cheshire
• Re: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: Francis Dupont
• Re: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• Re: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: Tim Chown
• Re: [96attendees] Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• RE: Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Please stop killing trees with pre-printed agendas
  • From: Robert Sparks
• Re: [96attendees] Lost black HP laptop in IETF plenary room
  • From: Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
• Re: plenary discussion about WG use of meeting space and times
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: DMARC and ietf.org
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: DMARC and ietf.org
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Non email WG participation
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: wrt quic, plus, and taps?
  • From: Brian Trammell
• Lost black HP laptop in IETF plenary room
  • From: Hui Deng
• plenary discussion about WG use of meeting space and times
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: IAOC -- looking for committee volunteers
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: DMARC and ietf.org
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: DMARC and ietf.org
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: DMARC and ietf.org
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: How to get feedback on published RFCs [resending as plaintext]
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: IAOC -- looking for committee volunteers
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: IAOC -- looking for committee volunteers
  • From: Eric Rescorla
• Re: IAOC -- looking for committee volunteers
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: wrt quic, plus, and taps?
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IAOC -- looking for committee volunteers
  • From: Adam Roach
• Re: IAOC -- looking for committee volunteers
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: IAOC -- looking for committee volunteers
  • From: Adam Roach
• Re: DMARC and ietf.org
  • From: John Levine
• Plenary information
  • From: IETF Chair
• RE: wrt quic, plus, and taps?
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• wrt quic, plus, and taps?
  • From: jeff . hodges
• IETF-96 t-shirt survey
  • From: Jeffrey Haas
• Re: How to get feedback on published RFCs
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: How to get feedback on published RFCs [resending as plaintext]
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: How to get feedback on published RFCs [resending as plaintext]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Whatwg [Re: How to get feedback on published RFCs]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: DMARC and ietf.org
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: 10 a.m.
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: How to get feedback on published RFCs
  • From: Alessandro Vesely
• Re: DMARC and ietf.org
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: DMARC and ietf.org
  • From: Russ Housley
• RE: How to get feedback on published RFCs [resending as plaintext]
  • From: MH Michael Hammer (5304)
• Re: How to get feedback on published RFCs [resending as plaintext]
  • From: Yaron Sheffer
• RE: How to get feedback on published RFCs [resending as plaintext]
  • From: MH Michael Hammer (5304)
• Re: How to get feedback on published RFCs [resending as plaintext]
  • From: Yaron Sheffer
• Re: How to get feedback on published RFCs [resending as plaintext]
  • From: Ted Lemon
• RE: How to get feedback on published RFCs [resending as plaintext]
  • From: Christer Holmberg
• Re: How to get feedback on published RFCs [resending as plaintext]
  • From: Miles Fidelman
• RE: How to get feedback on published RFCs [resending as plaintext]
  • From: MH Michael Hammer (5304)
• Re: How to get feedback on published RFCs
  • From: Yaron Sheffer
• Re: How to get feedback on published RFCs
  • From: S Moonesamy
• How to get feedback on published RFCs [resending as plaintext]
  • From: Yaron Sheffer
• RE: [nfsv4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout-06.txt> (Parallel NFS (pNFS) SCSI Layout) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Black, David
• Re: How to get feedback on published RFCs
  • From: Kathleen Moriarty
• How to get feedback on published RFCs
  • From: Yaron Sheffer
• Re: [nfsv4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout-06.txt> (Parallel NFS (pNFS) SCSI Layout) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Christoph Hellwig
• RE: [nfsv4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout-06.txt> (Parallel NFS (pNFS) SCSI Layout) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Black, David
• Re: IETF Endowment funding announcement
  • From: nalini.elkins
• IETF Endowment funding announcement
  • From: Kathy Brown
• Re: side event Wed. 20 July at IETF 96: "Open Debate on the Politics of Encryption"
  • From: Joseph Lorenzo Hall
• Re: DMARC and ietf.org
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: DMARC and ietf.org
  • From: John Payne
• Re: Tuesday lunchtime session (was Re: Report from the IAB)
  • From: Matthew Ford
• Re: [nfsv4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout-06.txt> (Parallel NFS (pNFS) SCSI Layout) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
• Re: [nfsv4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout-06.txt> (Parallel NFS (pNFS) SCSI Layout) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Christoph Hellwig
• RE: [nfsv4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout-06.txt> (Parallel NFS (pNFS) SCSI Layout) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Spencer Shepler
• Re: Comments on draft-deng-chinese-names-03.txt
  • From: Nori Demizu
• Re: [nfsv4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout-06.txt> (Parallel NFS (pNFS) SCSI Layout) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Christoph Hellwig
• Re: IETF note well relating to pictures?
  • From: John C Klensin
• Tuesday lunchtime session (was Re: Report from the IAB)
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: IETF note well relating to pictures?
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IETF note well relating to pictures?
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: Report from the IAB
  • From: S Moonesamy
• IETF note well relating to pictures?
  • From: Mikael Abrahamsson
• Report from the IAB
  • From: IAB Chair
• Re: IETF Endowment update
  • From: Leif Johansson
• Re: IETF Endowment update
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Re: IETF Endowment update
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: IETF Endowment update
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Re: IETF Endowment update
  • From: Richard Shockey
• Re: [rtcweb] Extended Last Call: <draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-14.txt> (Transports for WebRTC) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: IETF Endowment update
  • From: Doug Ewell
• Re: IETF Endowment update
  • From: Scott O. Bradner
• Re: IETF Endowment update
  • From: Richard Shockey
• Re: IETF Endowment update
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: IETF Endowment update
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Security Directorate review of draft-ietf-clue-datachannel-13
  • From: Barry Leiba
• IETF 96 - Changes to the Final Agenda
  • From: IETF Agenda
• Re: Proposed IETF Privacy Policy for Review
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Proposed IETF Privacy Policy for Review
  • From: Scott O. Bradner
• Re: IETF Endowment update
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: IETF Endowment update
  • From: Suzanne Woolf
• Re: IETF Endowment update
  • From: John Levine
• Chair and IESG report prior to IETF-96
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: IETF Endowment update
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: Proposed IETF Privacy Policy for Review
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: IETF Endowment update
  • From: Kathy Brown
• Re: IETF Endowment update
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: IETF Endowment update
  • From: Livingood, Jason
• Re: [rtcweb] Extended Last Call: <draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-14.txt> (Transports for WebRTC) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Magnus Westerlund
• Re: IETF Endowment update
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: IETF Endowment update
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: IETF Endowment update
  • From: Kathy Brown
• Re: IETF Endowment update
  • From: Richard Shockey
• Re: IETF funding needs (Was: Re: IETF Endowment update)
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Proposed IESG Statement on IPR Declarations
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: ensuring appropriate discussion on ietf@ietf
  • From: Henrik Levkowetz
• New IETF Journal website, latest issue now available
  • From: IETF Journal
• Re: Proposed IESG Statement on IPR Declarations
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: ensuring appropriate discussion on ietf@ietf
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• RE: ensuring appropriate discussion on ietf@ietf
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: ensuring appropriate discussion on ietf@ietf
  • From: Jari Arkko
• RE: ensuring appropriate discussion on ietf@ietf
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: Proposed IESG Statement on IPR Declarations
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IETF funding needs (Was: Re: IETF Endowment update)
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Re: Proposed IESG Statement on IPR Declarations
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel-10
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel-10
  • From: Peter Yee
• ensuring appropriate discussion on ietf@ietf
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Proposed IESG Statement on IPR Declarations
  • From: Jari Arkko
• IETF funding needs (Was: Re: IETF Endowment update)
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: IETF Endowment update
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: IETF Endowment update
  • From: John C Klensin
• IETF Endowment update
  • From: Kathy Brown
• Re: 10 a.m.
  • From: Mikael Abrahamsson
• Re: 10 a.m.
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: 10 a.m.
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: 10 a.m.
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: 10 a.m.
  • From: Tim Chown
• Fwd: Re: 10 a.m.
  • From: Sandy Wills
• Re: 10 a.m.
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: 10 a.m.
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: 10 a.m.
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: 10 a.m.
  • From: Tim Chown
• Re: 10 a.m.
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: 10 a.m.
  • From: Tim Chown
• Re: 10 a.m.
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: 10 a.m.
  • From: Alia Atlas
• Re: 10 a.m.
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: 10 a.m.
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: 10 a.m.
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: 10 a.m.
  • From: Alia Atlas
• Re: 10 a.m.
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: 10 a.m.
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: 10 a.m.
  • From: Alia Atlas
• Re: 10 a.m.
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: 10 a.m.
  • From: Jared Mauch
• Re: 10 a.m.
  • From: Theodore V Faber
• Re: 10 a.m.
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: 10 a.m.
  • From: Alia Atlas
• Re: 10 a.m.
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: 10 a.m.
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: 10 a.m.
  • From: Tim Chown
• Re: 10 a.m.
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: 10 a.m.
  • From: Alia Atlas
• 10 a.m.
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• RE: [nfsv4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout-06.txt> (Parallel NFS (pNFS) SCSI Layout) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Black, David
• Re: Proposed IESG Statement on IPR Declarations
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: Proposed IESG Statement on IPR Declarations
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Last Call: <draft-hardy-pdf-mime-02.txt> (The application/pdf Media Type) to Informational RFC
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-dnsop-maintain-ds-03
  • From: Robert Sparks
• New guest blog: Meet the IETF Systers
  • From: Allison Mankin
• Re: SecDir Review of https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hardy-pdf-mime-02#page-8
  • From: John C Klensin
• SecDir Review of https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hardy-pdf-mime-02#page-8
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Proposed IESG Statement on IPR Declarations
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: Proposed IESG Statement on IPR Declarations
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: Proposed IESG Statement on IPR Declarations
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: Proposed IESG Statement on IPR Declarations
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Proposed IESG Statement on IPR Declarations
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Proposed IESG Statement on IPR Declarations
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: Information-Centric Networking (icnrg) RG Interim Meeting: 2016-07-17 CHANGED
  • From: Alvaro Retana (aretana)
• IETF early bird deadline, Hackathon, and today's webinar
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Information-Centric Networking (icnrg) RG Interim Meeting: 2016-07-17 CHANGED
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• notes from BOF coordination call
  • From: IETF Chair
• RE: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: bruno.decraene
• Re: Genart LC (and likely telechat) review : draft-ietf-trill-tree-selection-04
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Gen-Art LC review of draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-pw-over-bidir-lsp-08
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel-09
  • From: Jari Arkko
• RE: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel-09
  • From: Peter Yee
• Re: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel-09
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Berlin Code Sprint
  • From: IETF Chair
• Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel-09
  • From: Peter Yee
• RE: [alto] IPR Disclosure Carlos Pignataro's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-alto-deployments belonging to Alcatel Lucent
  • From: Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR)
• Re: [alto] IPR Disclosure Carlos Pignataro's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-alto-deployments belonging to Alcatel Lucent
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: [alto] IPR Disclosure Carlos Pignataro's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-alto-deployments belonging to Alcatel Lucent
  • From: Sebastian Kiesel
• Re: [alto] IPR Disclosure Carlos Pignataro's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-alto-deployments belonging to Alcatel Lucent
  • From: Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
• RE: [alto] IPR Disclosure Carlos Pignataro's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-alto-deployments belonging to Alcatel Lucent
  • From: Scharf, Michael (Nokia - DE)
• Re: [alto] IPR Disclosure Carlos Pignataro's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-alto-deployments belonging to Alcatel Lucent
  • From: Y. Richard Yang
• Re: [alto] IPR Disclosure Carlos Pignataro's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-alto-deployments belonging to Alcatel Lucent
  • From: Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
• Re: [alto] IPR Disclosure Carlos Pignataro's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-alto-deployments belonging to Alcatel Lucent
  • From: Mirja Kühlewind
• Re: Comments on draft-deng-chinese-names-03.txt
  • From: Zhen Cao
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: heasley
• RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel-09
  • From: Peter Yee
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel-09
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• RE: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Michel Py
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Marco Marzetti
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Job Snijders
• Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel-09
  • From: Peter Yee
• RE: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Michel Py
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Christopher Morrow
• Re: Genart LC (and likely telechat) review : draft-ietf-trill-tree-selection-04
  • From: Robert Sparks
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: Genart LC (and likely telechat) review : draft-ietf-trill-tree-selection-04
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Job Snijders
• RE: Gen-Art LC review of draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-pw-over-bidir-lsp-08
  • From: Mach Chen
• Gen-Art LC review of draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-pw-over-bidir-lsp-08
  • From: Roni Even
• Gen-Art LC review of draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-pw-over-bidir-lsp-08
  • From: Roni Even
• RE: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Michel Py
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Christopher Morrow
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: heasley
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: heasley
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Job Snijders
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: David Farmer
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Jared Mauch
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Job Snijders
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• Re: Genart LC (and likely telechat) review : draft-ietf-trill-tree-selection-04
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Gert Doering
• Re: [Spasm] WG Review: Some PKIX and SMIME (spasm)
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Job Snijders
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• RE: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Michel Py
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Job Snijders
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Genart LC (and likely telechat) review : draft-ietf-trill-tree-selection-04
  • From: Robert Sparks
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Job Snijders
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Thomas Mangin
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Job Snijders
• Call for Participation: ACM, IRTF & ISOC Applied Networking Research Workshop 2016
  • From: Eggert, Lars
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Christopher Morrow
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Gert Doering
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Christopher Morrow
• Re: [96attendees] : REG: Taxi fare from Tegel Airport to IETF Venue
  • From: Christopher Morrow
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Christopher Morrow
• RE: [96attendees] : REG: Taxi fare from Tegel Airport to IETF Venue
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: side event Wed. 20 July at IETF 96: "Open Debate on the Politics of Encryption"
  • From: Joseph Lorenzo Hall
• Re: side event Wed. 20 July at IETF 96: "Open Debate on the Politics of Encryption"
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: joel jaeggli
• RE: [96attendees] : REG: Taxi fare from Tegel Airport to IETF Venue
  • From: Sudhin Jacob
• Re: [96attendees] : REG: Taxi fare from Tegel Airport to IETF Venue
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• : REG: Taxi fare from Tegel Airport to IETF Venue
  • From: Sudhin Jacob
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: joel jaeggli
• RE: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Michel Py
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: John Kristoff
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: joel jaeggli
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Job Snijders
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Job Snijders
• Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Christopher Morrow
• Re: TSV-ART review of draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance
  • From: Tim Wicinski
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Michel Py
• Re: side event Wed. 20 July at IETF 96: "Open Debate on the Politics of Encryption"
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Re: [saag] side event Wed. 20 July at IETF 96: "Open Debate on the Politics of Encryption"
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• RE: side event Wed. 20 July at IETF 96: "Open Debate on the Politics of Encryption"
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• side event Wed. 20 July at IETF 96: "Open Debate on the Politics of Encryption"
  • From: Joseph Lorenzo Hall
• Re: FINAL list of volunteers for the 2016-2017 NomCom
  • From: Lucy Lynch
• Re: FINAL list of volunteers for the 2016-2017 NomCom
  • From: Michael StJohns
• FW: [hackathon] Reminder - Need to register separately for hackathon
  • From: Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
• IETF 96 FInal Agenda
  • From: IETF Agenda
• IETF 96 Social Event Tickets Now Available!
  • From: IETF Secretariat
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Christopher Morrow
• Re: IETF Sustainability - New Website Launch
  • From: Kathy Brown
• RE: Last Call: <draft-holmberg-dispatch-rfc7315-updates-06.txt> (Updates to Private Header (P-Header) Extension Usage in Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Requests/Responses) to Informational RFC
  • From: Christer Holmberg
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Michel Py
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: John Kristoff
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Michel Py
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Christopher Morrow
• RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Michel Py
• Re: www.ietf.org Revamp Update
  • From: Joe Hildebrand
• RE: www.ietf.org Revamp Update
  • From: Tony Hain
• Re: www.ietf.org Revamp Update
  • From: Joe Hildebrand
• Re: WG Review: Meeting Venue (mtgvenue)
  • From: Abdussalam Baryun
• Re: IMHO we really need a discussion of this imaginative proposal.
  • From: Jared Mauch
• IMHO we really need a discussion of this imaginative proposal.
  • From: Richard Shockey
• Re: Facilitators experiment
  • From: S Moonesamy
• IETF 96 Preliminary Agenda
  • From: IETF Agenda
• Re: TSV-ART review of draft-ietf-forces-interfelfb
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: TSV-ART review of draft-ietf-forces-interfelfb
  • From: Jamal Hadi Salim
• Call for Participation: ACM, IRTF & ISOC Applied Networking Research Workshop 2016
  • From: Eggert, Lars
• Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
  • From: Rich Kulawiec
• www.ietf.org Revamp Update
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective
  • From: Margaret Cullen
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability-15
  • From: Jari Arkko
• TSV-ART review of draft-ietf-forces-interfelfb
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: IETF Sustainability - New Website Launch
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: IETF Sustainability - New Website Launch
  • From: Dave Taht
• Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
  • From: Dave Taht
• Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
  • From: Michael Richardson
• FW: [hackathon] extended hacking
  • From: Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
• RE: IETF Sustainability - New Website Launch
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: IETF Sustainability - New Website Launch
  • From: Bert Wijnen (IETF)
• Re: IETF Sustainability - New Website Launch
  • From: lloyd.wood
• Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
  • From: Randy Bush
• IETF Sustainability - New Website Launch
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
  • From: Michael Richardson
• TSV-ART review of draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance
  • From: Brian Trammell
• Berlin BoFs
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
  • From: Dave Taht
• A somewhat different thought about IETF evolution
  • From: Steve Crocker
• Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
  • From: Ross Finlayson
• RE: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
  • From: Jaap Akkerhuis
• Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
  • From: Dave Taht
• long term ietf evolution comments
  • From: Dave Taht
• Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
  • From: Rich Kulawiec
• Re: Facilitators experiment
  • From: Doug Ewell
• Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• 3. Focus on linking open standards to code, operationals, and interoperability.
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• RE: actions related to improving IETF meeting selections
  • From: Sheng Jiang
• Re: actions related to improving IETF meeting selections
  • From: Melinda Shore
• RE: actions related to improving IETF meeting selections
  • From: Sheng Jiang
• Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: Under-represented communities [Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts]
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Under-represented communities [Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: actions related to improving IETF meeting selections
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: actions related to improving IETF meeting selections
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: actions related to improving IETF meeting selections
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: actions related to improving IETF meeting selections
  • From: Ted Lemon
• Re: actions related to improving IETF meeting selections
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
  • From: nalini.elkins
• Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Re: Facilitators experiment
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Long-term IETF evolution thoughts
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]
  • From: Lloyd Wood
• RE: actions related to improving IETF meeting selections
  • From: Sheng Jiang
• Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]
  • From: John Leslie
• Re: Value and respect [Re: IETF 100, IAOC perspective]
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Ben Campbell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability-15
  • From: Peter Yee
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Gmail
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: IAB volunteers
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: [tsvwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-13.txt> (UDP Usage Guidelines) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Gorry Fairhurst
• Re: [tsvwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-13.txt> (UDP Usage Guidelines) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Ca By
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Scott Bradner
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: my summary of discussion regarding IETF #100
  • From: John Curran
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-13.txt> (UDP Usage Guidelines) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Brian Trammell
• RE: my summary of discussion regarding IETF #100
  • From: Tony Hain
• Re: [Idr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server-10.txt> (Internet Exchange BGP Route Server) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Marco Marzetti
• Re: [Idr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server-10.txt> (Internet Exchange BGP Route Server) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Robert Raszuk
• Re: [Idr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server-10.txt> (Internet Exchange BGP Route Server) to Proposed Standard
  • From: David Huberman
• Re: [Idr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server-10.txt> (Internet Exchange BGP Route Server) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Marco Marzetti
• Re: [Idr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server-10.txt> (Internet Exchange BGP Route Server) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• Re: [Idr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server-10.txt> (Internet Exchange BGP Route Server) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Marco Marzetti
• Re: my summary of discussion regarding IETF #100
  • From: Dean Willis
• Re: CIRI Human Rights Data Project
  • From: Andrew Allen
• Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-13.txt> (UDP Usage Guidelines) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Mark Allman
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [Idr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server-10.txt> (Internet Exchange BGP Route Server) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: John Levine
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Ted Lemon
• RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: MH Michael Hammer (5304)
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: lloyd.wood
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: lloyd.wood
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: lloyd.wood
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Yoav Nir
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: John C Klensin
• A message from the facilitators about the current threads
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Michal Krsek
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Marie-Jose Montpetit
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: my summary of discussion regarding IETF #100
  • From: Leif Johansson
• Re: Value of meeting attendance (was Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100)
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Fernando Gont
• my summary of discussion regarding IETF #100
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Robert O'Callahan
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: James Seng
• Re: Value of meeting attendance (was Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100)
  • From: Stephen Strowes
• RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Dave Hood
• RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Jamie Baxter
• RE: Value of meeting attendance (was Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100)
  • From: Christer Holmberg
• Value of meeting attendance (was Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100)
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: kathleen . moriarty . ietf
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Michael StJohns
• RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Christer Holmberg
• Re: IAOC response to question of clarification Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Rich Kulawiec
• Success metrics Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Bill Mills
• IAOC response to question of clarification Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
  • From: Leslie Daigle
• Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6485bis-05
  • From: Roni Even
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Margaret Cullen
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Leslie Daigle
• Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Marc Blanchet
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Leslie Daigle
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis
  • From: Roni Even
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: PEDRO ANDRES ARANDA GUTIERREZ
• RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: MH Michael Hammer (5304)
• Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: lloyd.wood
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Bert Wijnen (IETF)
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Lorenzo Colitti
• Why we meet (was Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100)
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Dan Harkins
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Derek Jett
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Aaron Morgan
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: James Seng
• Re: IETF-100 maybe it's mostly been said? (Was: Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100)
  • From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Joe Abley
• CIRI Human Rights Data Project
  • From: David Benham (dbenham)
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Joel Snyder
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Lloyd Wood
• Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
  • From: Keith Moore