Re: why can't one alias `git stash`?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2025-08-18 at 18:01 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> As a program, how would you tell when you are run by a script?
> 
> If you are a shell, you go into "interactive" mode when you are
> taking your command stream from a tty, and otherwise assume you are
> not interactive.  The same trick would not work at all for programs
> started by a shell, would it?

Not for all, but it might still give enough "teaching" to prevent
people from using aliases in scripts.

Checking whether the parent process is a well known shell would
probably not help, as it would also be for the interactive case, where
aliasing is wanted.


> Asking script writers to pass "--no-alias" option to all of their
> "git" invocation will probably not be a viable way forward, either.

Again at least not a safe one. And doing the opposite, i.e. requring --
enable-aliasing (which people would then have to set as shell alias),
would probably end up in generating quite a few annoyed people. ;-)

It could be made optional. E.g. some gitconf option that per default
enables aliasing always but allows to require a --aliasing option
(which then again is intended to be set via a shell alias) in order for
git aliasing to be enabled.

Whether it's worth the effort is of course another question.


Cheers,
Chris.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux