Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] Git 2.51

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 5:37 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> <rsbecker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > On August 19, 2025 4:46 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >>Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>---
> >> GIT-VERSION-GEN | 2 +-
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/GIT-VERSION-GEN b/GIT-VERSION-GEN index
> >>be801415bddc..64cbc5833536 100755
> >>--- a/GIT-VERSION-GEN
> >>+++ b/GIT-VERSION-GEN
> >>@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> >> #!/bin/sh
> >>
> >>-DEF_VER=v2.51.0-rc2
> >>+DEF_VER=v2.51.0
> >>
> >> LF='
> >> '
> >
> > Will this cause a re-roll of the git 2.51.0 release?
>
> I don't know.  This is not something I did.

I also don't see any such PRs at GitGitGadget:
https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pulls?q=2.51.0

But when triple-checking the lore archive, I realized that I think
this is a result of Julia's PR getting rebased on top of 2.51.0?
https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/1952/commits

Perhaps Julia didn't use `--keep-base`, which I often forget to do
when rebasing for contribution to Git (it's common in my other
projects to omit it when working on the next version of a series).
Indeed, fetching the published branch shows it's sitting on top of the
v2.51.0 tag.

-- 
D. Ben Knoble





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux