Alexander Monakov <amonakov@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Using xxhash() was merely a sample code path for technology >> demonstration, so the Rust adoption topic may want to pick a >> different code path to do its thing. > > My interest here is just speeding up xdiff in C, is that a welcome topic? It seems that the (side) discussion on the performance has concluded, and Ezekiel's new iteration of the Rust thing moved to a non-overlapping part of the system, so I do not see any reason to keep this topic out of 'next'. Is everybody OK for me to mark the topic for 'next' soonish? Any objections I overlooked? Thanks.
