On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 4:52 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Alexander Monakov <amonakov@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > >> Using xxhash() was merely a sample code path for technology > >> demonstration, so the Rust adoption topic may want to pick a > >> different code path to do its thing. > > > > My interest here is just speeding up xdiff in C, is that a welcome topic? > > It seems that the (side) discussion on the performance has > concluded, and Ezekiel's new iteration of the Rust thing moved to a > non-overlapping part of the system, so I do not see any reason to > keep this topic out of 'next'. > > Is everybody OK for me to mark the topic for 'next' soonish? Any > objections I overlooked? > > Thanks. > That seems reasonable to me.
