On Thu, Sep 04, 2025 at 02:30:58PM +0100, Phillip Wood wrote: > On 04/09/2025 08:09, Patrick Steinhardt wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 11:40:05AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > > > > I have no problem with that. I am still unsure about that "reftable > > > cares about the name being 'master'" thing. If that can live with > > > any 6 byte name, we may want to fix it to something different from > > > 'master', for the sake of removing 'master'. Perhaps 'banana' or > > > something? > > > > Huh, did I miss anything? I scanned the thread for reftables but > > couldn't find any discussion around it relying on a 6 byte name. Could > > you maybe provide a pointer to what you are referring to? > > c.f. <xmqqwm6ozn7d.fsf@gitster.g>. In t0613 some of the tests check various > sizes of things in the reftable and those depend on the length of the branch > name Ah, makes sense. Thanks for the pointer. Patrick
