On 22 July 2025 10:53:04 pm IST, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >Aditya Garg <gargaditya08@xxxxxxxx> writes: > >> Hmm, yes it does, but is this functionality in the scope of this patch? > >No, it is not. > >But it is your responsibility to make sure that you leave the door >open for somebody who will want to do so later. And you do so by >not squatting on a way more generic option and configuration >variable name than what the feature you are adding, which is more >specific than its name. I got that. I was not against renaming, I was just hoping for a better name. Anyways, I hope v3 sent already has addressed this concern.
