Re: [PATCH v6 5/5] bloom: optimize multiple pathspec items in revision

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> Derrick Stolee <stolee@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
>> On 7/12/2025 5:51 AM, Lidong Yan wrote:
>>> To enable optimize multiple pathspec items in revision traversal,
>>> return 0 if all pathspec item is literal in forbid_bloom_filters().
>>> Add for loops to initialize and check each pathspec item's bloom_keyvec
>>> when optimization is possible.
>> 
>> The patch itself is good.
>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Lidong Yan <502024330056@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@xxxxxxxxx>
>> 
>> Here, I'll just point out that your sign-off should follow mine
>> because you were the last to touch the patch. In this way, the
>> sign-off gives a kind of timestamp to who made the most-recent
>> changes (and that those changes have that person's sign-off,
>> and may not have been vetted by previous signers).
> 
> Thanks for pointing it out.  Also perhaps a single-liner attribution
> to clarify who did what, e.g.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Derrick
> [ly: did this and that to derrick's code to adjust]
> Signed-off-by: Lidong

I will fix the order of the sign-offs, add the attributes, and resend
PATCH v6 5/5.

Thanks,
Lidong




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux