Re: [PATCH v6 5/5] bloom: optimize multiple pathspec items in revision

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Derrick Stolee <stolee@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 7/12/2025 5:51 AM, Lidong Yan wrote:
>> To enable optimize multiple pathspec items in revision traversal,
>> return 0 if all pathspec item is literal in forbid_bloom_filters().
>> Add for loops to initialize and check each pathspec item's bloom_keyvec
>> when optimization is possible.
>
> The patch itself is good.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Lidong Yan <502024330056@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Here, I'll just point out that your sign-off should follow mine
> because you were the last to touch the patch. In this way, the
> sign-off gives a kind of timestamp to who made the most-recent
> changes (and that those changes have that person's sign-off,
> and may not have been vetted by previous signers).

Thanks for pointing it out.  Also perhaps a single-liner attribution
to clarify who did what, e.g.

	Signed-off-by: Derrick
	[ly: did this and that to derrick's code to adjust]
	Signed-off-by: Lidong

would be more helpful.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux