Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] for-each-ref: introduce a '--skip-until' option

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> +	if (filter.seek && sorting_options.nr > 1)
> +		die(_("cannot use --skip-until custom sort options"));

Missing "with" before "custom sort".

When I commented on the previous iteration about sorting, I didn't
mean to suggest making them incompatible---it may have some use case
to grab a batch out of the underlying refstore, sort refs in that
batch, and then show them.  But from usability's point of view, I
tend to agree with this design decision.  Such an unnatural batching
and sorting operation is probably not worth supporting.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux