Re: [PATCH v3 10/12] usage: allow dying without writing an error message

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes:

> Sometimes code wants to die in a situation where it already has written
> an error message. To use the same error code as `die()` we have to open
> code the code with a call to `exit(128)` in such cases, which is easy to

Nit: This reads a little weird.

> get wrong and leaves magical numbers all over our codebase.
>
> Teach `die_message_builtin()` to not print any error when passed a
> `NULL` pointer as error string. Like this, such users can now call
> `die(NULL)` to achieve the same result without any hardcoded error
> codes.
>
> Adapt a couple of builtins to use this new pattern to demonstrate that
> there is a need for such a helper.
>

[snip]

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux