On Tue, Jun 3, 2025, at 08:34, Patrick Steinhardt wrote: >> [snip] >> I’m a naïve reader. When I read this I immediately thought that reflogs >> can be packed now. But going by the last paragraph it is packed >> references and expired reflogs? > > Yeah, I see how this is misleading. But indeed, it is packing refs and > expiring reflogs. I've rephrased this locally, but if that's okay with > you I'll hold off sending a new version for just this change. Certainly! I forgot to prefix: nit -- Kristoffer Haugsbakk
