[PATCH 3/3] receive-pack: handle reference deletions separately

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In 9d2962a7c4 (receive-pack: use batched reference updates, 2025-05-19)
we updated the 'git-receive-pack(1)' command to use batched reference
updates. One edge case which was missed during this implementation was
when a user pushes multiple branches such as:

  delete refs/heads/branch/conflict
  create refs/heads/branch

Before using batched updates, the references would be applied
sequentially and hence no conflicts would arise. With batched updates,
while the first update applies, the second fails due to F/D conflict. A
similar issue was present in 'git-fetch(1)' and was fixed by using
separating out reference pruning into a separate transaction. Apply a
similar mechanism for 'git-receive-pack(1)' and separate out reference
deletions into its own batch.

Add a test to validate this behavior.

Signed-off-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 builtin/receive-pack.c           | 23 +++++++++++++++++++----
 t/t1416-ref-transaction-hooks.sh |  2 ++
 t/t5516-fetch-push.sh            | 17 +++++++++++++----
 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/builtin/receive-pack.c b/builtin/receive-pack.c
index 9e3cfb85cf..7157ced2a6 100644
--- a/builtin/receive-pack.c
+++ b/builtin/receive-pack.c
@@ -1860,7 +1860,8 @@ static void ref_transaction_rejection_handler(const char *refname,
 }
 
 static void execute_commands_non_atomic(struct command *commands,
-					struct shallow_info *si)
+					struct shallow_info *si,
+					int only_deletions)
 {
 	struct command *cmd;
 	struct strbuf err = STRBUF_INIT;
@@ -1879,6 +1880,8 @@ static void execute_commands_non_atomic(struct command *commands,
 	for (cmd = commands; cmd; cmd = cmd->next) {
 		if (!should_process_cmd(cmd) || cmd->run_proc_receive)
 			continue;
+		if (only_deletions ^ is_null_oid(&cmd->new_oid))
+			continue;
 
 		cmd->error_string = update(cmd, si);
 	}
@@ -2024,6 +2027,9 @@ static void execute_commands(struct command *commands,
 	/*
 	 * If there is no command ready to run, should return directly to destroy
 	 * temporary data in the quarantine area.
+	 *
+	 * Check if any reference deletions exist, these are batched together in
+	 * a separate transaction to avoid F/D conflicts with other updates.
 	 */
 	for (cmd = commands; cmd && cmd->error_string; cmd = cmd->next)
 		; /* nothing */
@@ -2058,10 +2064,19 @@ static void execute_commands(struct command *commands,
 			    (cmd->run_proc_receive || use_atomic))
 				cmd->error_string = "fail to run proc-receive hook";
 
-	if (use_atomic)
+	if (use_atomic) {
 		execute_commands_atomic(commands, si);
-	else
-		execute_commands_non_atomic(commands, si);
+	} else {
+		/*
+		 * Reference updates, where F/D conflicts shouldn't arise due to
+		 * one reference being deleted, while the other being created
+		 * are treated as conflicts in batched updates. This is because
+		 * we don't do conflict resolution inside a transaction. To
+		 * mitigate this, delete references in a separate batch.
+		 */
+		execute_commands_non_atomic(commands, si, 1);
+		execute_commands_non_atomic(commands, si, 0);
+	}
 
 	if (shallow_update)
 		BUG_if_skipped_connectivity_check(commands, si);
diff --git a/t/t1416-ref-transaction-hooks.sh b/t/t1416-ref-transaction-hooks.sh
index d91dd3a3b5..b2aaa1908f 100755
--- a/t/t1416-ref-transaction-hooks.sh
+++ b/t/t1416-ref-transaction-hooks.sh
@@ -119,6 +119,8 @@ test_expect_success 'interleaving hook calls succeed' '
 	EOF
 
 	cat >expect <<-EOF &&
+		hooks/reference-transaction prepared
+		hooks/reference-transaction committed
 		hooks/update refs/tags/PRE $ZERO_OID $PRE_OID
 		hooks/update refs/tags/POST $ZERO_OID $POST_OID
 		hooks/reference-transaction prepared
diff --git a/t/t5516-fetch-push.sh b/t/t5516-fetch-push.sh
index 029ef92d58..34eb3a5a07 100755
--- a/t/t5516-fetch-push.sh
+++ b/t/t5516-fetch-push.sh
@@ -744,8 +744,8 @@ test_expect_success 'pushing valid refs triggers post-receive and post-update ho
 		EOF
 
 		cat >update.expect <<-EOF &&
-		refs/heads/main $orgmain $newmain
 		refs/heads/next $orgnext $newnext
+		refs/heads/main $orgmain $newmain
 		EOF
 
 		cat >post-receive.expect <<-EOF &&
@@ -808,8 +808,8 @@ test_expect_success 'deletion of a non-existent ref is not fed to post-receive a
 		EOF
 
 		cat >update.expect <<-EOF &&
-		refs/heads/main $orgmain $newmain
 		refs/heads/nonexistent $ZERO_OID $ZERO_OID
+		refs/heads/main $orgmain $newmain
 		EOF
 
 		cat >post-receive.expect <<-EOF &&
@@ -868,10 +868,10 @@ test_expect_success 'mixed ref updates, deletes, invalid deletes trigger hooks w
 		EOF
 
 		cat >update.expect <<-EOF &&
-		refs/heads/main $orgmain $newmain
 		refs/heads/next $orgnext $newnext
-		refs/heads/seen $orgseen $newseen
 		refs/heads/nonexistent $ZERO_OID $ZERO_OID
+		refs/heads/main $orgmain $newmain
+		refs/heads/seen $orgseen $newseen
 		EOF
 
 		cat >post-receive.expect <<-EOF &&
@@ -1909,4 +1909,13 @@ test_expect_success 'push with config push.useBitmaps' '
 		--thin --delta-base-offset -q --no-use-bitmap-index <false
 '
 
+test_expect_success 'push with F/D conflict with deletion and creation' '
+	test_when_finished "git branch -D branch" &&
+	git branch branch/conflict &&
+	mk_test testrepo heads/branch/conflict &&
+	git branch -D branch/conflict &&
+	git branch branch &&
+	git push testrepo :refs/heads/branch/conflict refs/heads/branch
+'
+
 test_done

-- 
2.49.0





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux