Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > You're welcome to submit an additional patch implementing Kristoffer's > suggestion. Normally, it would make sense to send them both as a > two-patch series, however, I'm not so sure that that would be a good > idea in this case. The reason I question it is that the original patch > is an obvious and uncontroversial fix, however, Kristoffer's > suggestion -- because it is a subjective change -- may get pushback > from reviewers. I had the same thought. If I were working on this topic, I'd send the original as-is with the suggested name fix, let it graduate, and then after all the dust settled, do enumeration-style changes as a new and totally independent patch, which may cover enumerations other than this single instance. Thanks.
