On Wed, May 28, 2025, at 09:20, Eric Sunshine wrote: >> Because then you can use commas freely inside each point. > > I'd like to push back on this suggestion, at least in the context of > this particular patch, the purpose of which is to fix an actual > problem in the documentation. The sort of improvement you suggest > probably ought to be done as a separate patch, but let's not make it > seem as if we are heaping extra work on the patch submitter; it's more > important to get the fix itself landed. > > As such, the patch itself looks obviously correct and is a definite > improvement as-is. It's not clear why it didn't get picked up; perhaps > it just fell through the cracks. Okay, totally reasonable and makes sense IMO.
