https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2387518 --- Comment #12 from Christian Hergert <chergert@xxxxxxxxxx> --- It's probably fine at this point to dynamically link to `libfoundry`. Ultimately, I had a long term goal of being able to "push" the binary to an external system like an agent/remote-control for remove development. But for the 1.0, we're just not there yet. Also, statically linking anything with glib/glibc involved is a nightmare. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2387518 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202387518%23c12 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
