https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2369466 Jarek Prokop <jprokop@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(jprokop@xxxxxxxxx | |m) | --- Comment #31 from Jarek Prokop <jprokop@xxxxxxxxxx> --- >[ ]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. > Note: No known owner of /usr/share/doc/nodejs24/npm >[ ]: Package must own all directories that it creates. > Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/doc/nodejs24/npm, > /usr/share/node-24 there seem to be %dir on these directories in packages that use them, but maybe fedora-review might've gotten a bit confused about them. AFAICT, RPM knows about these in the built packages (or it was fixed since running the template) and are present correctly where needed. Raised items of not being able to build on all the major Fedora arches and the macro use for BRs were cleared, rest of the package was checked last time (and now), LGTM. Package Approved! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2369466 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202369466%23c31 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
