But I understand how the implicit removal through the ghost mechanism can be
seen as a convenience by some users.
Stuff like this still irritates me:
Looks like package installs/installed /etc/dracut-sshd/sshd_config:
rpm -ql dracut-sshd | grep etc
/etc/dracut-sshd
/etc/dracut-sshd/sshd_config
But directory is empty (arguably some more clutter in /etc ...):
find /etc/dracut-sshd -ls
45717 0 drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 0 May 27 00:00
/etc/dracut-sshd
While dump also includes it:
rpm -q --dump dracut-sshd | grep etc | column -t
/etc/dracut-sshd 0 1748304000
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 040755 root
root 0 0 0 X
/etc/dracut-sshd/sshd_config 0 1748304000
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 0100644 root
root 1 0 0 X
However, verify says that everything is complete:
$ rpm -q --verify dracut-sshd
$
IOW, I wouldn't mind if rpm would even remove this feature.
Anyhow, I can live with that ghost marking.
---
> Those are all packaging bugs, there should be zero of those. It's effectively MUST NOT.
Ok, then perhaps it makes sense to use 'MUST NOT' language in the fedora
packaging guide.
Technically, one could even check for this in bodhi and fail builds when
violations are detected; but this feels way too extreme.
Also wouldn't hurt if the guide includes some guidance on ghost files.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2363206
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202363206%23c12
--
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
