https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2367629 --- Comment #16 from Benson Muite <benson_muite@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- %files libs %license LICENSE %{_libdir}/libsndio.so.* should have soname not just a glob in %{_libdir}/libsndio.so.* %{_libdir}/libsndio.so is in both libs and devel packages, it should only be in the devel package > I changed the changelog position and added the symlink for the soname. The first part of the soname should be included in the files listing. > I am currently unsure how to handle the dividing into packages, since > I realized that the base package is empty. Should I make it a meta-package > that just depends on all sub-packages, should I move the tools into it, or > should I drop it completely? I haven't found anything about that in the > packaging guidelines. You can add a meta-package if you think it would be helpful, but it is not necessary. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2367629 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202367629%23c16 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
