[Bug 2346041] Review Request: 7zip - Command-line file archiver with high compression ratio

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2346041



--- Comment #41 from Sergio Basto <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
Hi,

1. LOCAL_FLAGS is use some cases and not in other cases , I don't think is a
good place to set it duplicated switches 

2. the spec is original form the fedora p7zip.spec it preserve same locations ,
it provides a patch to be compatible with p7zip, and I copied things from
Debian and from Suse , I checked Arch, I copied the good things from there, ,
it took me same time figure out the solution was dropped asm build like Debian
because uasm is not a good license.  

3. I build 6 binaries not one , I think we need keep 7zip-plugins , I maintain
the structure of old package and compatibility, we can replace p7zip with this
7zip 

4. my gcc lines are without any duplicated switch


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2346041

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202346041%23c41

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux