https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2354972 --- Comment #7 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) <sanjay.ankur@xxxxxxxxx> --- The guidelines say: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/license-field/#_basic_rule "... License: tag expression should be an enumeration of all licenses found in the source code of the package, but excluding any licenses that cover material in the source code that is not copied into the binary RPM(s), either verbatim or transformed in some way (for example, by compilation)." So, in this case, since the third party bits aren't ending up in the binary, we don't need to include their licenses etc. nor specify them as bundled. I think we should add a note in the spec about this, and a reminder that this should be re-checked for every new release, just in case upstream does start to use them to build the library etc. I'll complete the review in the next couple of days. Cheers, -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2354972 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202354972%23c7 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
